Rhetoric, reality and shale gas

There is a heated debate going on in New Brunswick over shale gas. Some want to proceed with exploration and extraction; some do not. Others are on the fence. What are the various political parties saying?

The Progressive Conservatives (now in power and desperate for some good economic news) want to push the industry forward. They have done a miserable job of handling the economic file and badly need a ‘success’ before the next election, which will be held in September 2014.

The Liberal Party wants a moratorium on exploration. A moratorium, by definition, is a suspension of an activity until certain conditions are met. In this case, the conditions might be related to environmental concerns being satisfied, although the Liberals have not been exactly clear on this. The more vague you are about the conditions, the easier it will be for you to say at a later date that the conditions have been met.

The New Democratic Party position is similar to that of the Liberals, although they want what amounts to a legislative moratorium. In other words, they want a moratorium put in place via a vote in the Legislature such that the moratorium could only be removed via another vote. The NDP use a clever trick of saying that they want a ‘ban’ on the industry. However, they imply that the moratorium would be supported by them only until a cost/benefit analysis shows that shale gas development has a net benefit to the province. In other words, they also support shale gas exploitation in principle, but demand that certain conditions be met.

Those opposed to shale gas development don’t appear to be interested in cost/benefit analyses or assurances of safety. They simply do not want the development to go forward. If that is an important enough issue to them, then logically they would vote for the Green Party, as that is the only Party that rejects shale gas outright.

The winner of the next provincial election will almost certainly be either the PCs or the Liberals. Perhaps the NDP will pick up a few seats and hold the balance of power. Given the province’s current economic condition, it is clear to me that whoever wins (or whoever holds the balance of power in a minority government) will eventually allow shale gas exploitation to proceed. It is a matter therefore of how much oversight, monitoring and regulation is put in place before the development proceeds.

Given the above, it might be worthwhile if the media spent less time inquiring whether politicians ‘support’ gas extraction or not and more time discussing how the gas should be used. After all, the gas is a public asset, and we should not just be discussing whether or not it should be exploited, but (if we do exploit it) how it should be used. Should we allow the industry to just release the gas into pipelines delivering the gas elsewhere or should we do what is necessary to encourage use of the gas here in NB. Supplying low cost gas to NB industry and residents might have some long-term economic advantages.


Facebooktwitterby feather

When I become Lord High Executioner for New Brunswick ……

I have been informed by a reliable source that when King Stephen (Colbert) ascends the Throne of Canada, he will appoint me as Lord High Executioner for New Brunswick. Although a heavy burden, I believe I will have no choice but to accept the position. The Province must be saved from itself.

Please be advised, that after due thought and consideration, the following edicts will be issued:

1. Shale gas exploration will be BANNED. Instead, we will drill for gas at random locations (or where directed by me). For example, I have it on good authority that there is plenty of gas under the Fredericton Playhouse.

2. As voting in NB simply raises false hopes, electing politicians via voting will be BANNED. Instead I, as LHE(NB), will make all political appointments, in return for suitable inducements.

3. Redemption centres will be BANNED. Instead, grocery stores will be given the right to sell wine and beer with the proviso that they accept all plastic and glass bottles and cans, and refund deposits on same. Convenience stores may also sell wine and beer, but only if they call themselves ‘dépanneur‘, as in ‘Dépanneur Scholten’. Meanwhile Alcool NB stores will continue to sell liquor, with added marijuana and cocaine products.

4. Twitter will be BANNED. Now get back to work.

5. Statues in Fredericton of foreigners, such as those of Robbie Burns, will be torn down and replaced with statues of Stompin’ Tom, Don Messer, and Louis J Robichaud. The latter will be quite large; in fact, I may require that the entire Old Loyalist Burying Ground be re-purposed for that use. It is time to move on, folks.

6. Fredericton will be re-named  as ‘That Little Village Upriver’, or TLVU. New Maryland, Oromocto, outlying villages and LSDs will be merged with Fredericton to form ‘Greater TLVU’.

7. Moncton will invade and conquer Riverview, and the resulting entity shall be renamed as ‘The/Le Boor’.

8. Saint John shall absorb Rothesay and other outlying areas with silly names, such as Quiswhatever, and the resulting entity shall be renamed as ‘Town of Everlasting Fog’. All meetings of Council appointees shall be held on Reversing Falls Jetboats.

9. The Capital shall be removed to Renous, although travel to Renous will be BANNED.

10. All sociologists will be given actual work to perform.

Other edicts to follow, upon my appointment.



Facebooktwitterby feather